Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

6/28/2013 (9 months ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

In short, the majority on the United States Supreme Court see us as outlaws. To defend traditional marriage is tantamount to

In one fell swoop, the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Windsor killed the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), thereby assuring that same-sex "marriages" recognized under State laws must be treated as marriages under Federal law.  The immediate result of the majority holding is to open up to the partners of same-sex "marriage" thousands of benefits, including estate tax exemptions, social security benefits, the ability to file joint tax returns, and so forth. But that result is not the worst of it.  What is worse is what the opinion forebodes. 

Article Highlights

By Andrew M. Greenwell, Esq.

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

6/28/2013 (9 months ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: same-sex marriage, Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA,


CORPUS CHRISTI, TX (Catholic Online) - In one fell swoop, five justices composing a majority of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Windsor killed the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), thereby assuring that same-sex "marriages" recognized under State laws must be treated as marriages under Federal law. 

The immediate result of the majority holding is to open up to the partners of same-sex "marriage" thousands of benefits, including estate tax exemptions, social security benefits, the ability to file joint tax returns, and so forth.  The ripple effect will be significant.

But that result is not the worst of it. 

What is worse is what the opinion forebodes. 

The majority opinion--authored by "sweet mystery of life" Justice Kennedy and joined by the irreformable liberal justices Gingsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan--states in not-so-veiled language that defending traditional marriage serves to "degrade or demean" same-sex "marriage," that it causes "injury and indignity" to, that it clearly evinces a "bare . . . desire to harm," and that it can only intend to "disparage and injure" same-sex couples.

As recognized by the dissenting justices, in particular Justice Scalia, the fundamental premise of the majority opinion--clearly visible through its "argle bargle" and "rootless and shifting" justifications that sound (but really only sound) in federalism, equal protection, and due process--is that any sort of held view that marriage and its benefits should be limited to a union between one man and one woman is "irrational," and therefore can only be motivated by "malice," or "bigotry." 

It is only legislators "with hateful hearts" that could have "voted 'aye'" on DOMA. 

It is only "mean-spirited" justices that would support such laws.

What this sort of rabid secular liberal dogma held by the majority forebodes is that any action, legislative, political, social, or religious, seeking to sustain traditional marriage--since by definition it infringes upon same-sex "marriage"--is ipso facto a legal, political, or social evil. 

Worse, in the view of the self-righteous majority, such a view is necessarily motivated by spite, by hatred, by bigots and moral ignoramuses.  The intent is necessarily evil.

In the view of the majority of the Supreme Court, to borrow from the dissent of Justice Scalia, "any resistance to" the majority's holding is "beyond the pale of reasoned disagreement."  It follows that only a fool or, what's worse, a bigot would hold against the enlightened majority.

In effect, by "adjudging those who oppose" same-sex "marriage" equivalent to "hostes humani generis, enemies of the human race," the majority has declared war against advocates of traditional marriage. 

In short, the majority on the United States Supreme Court see us as outlaws.  To defend traditional marriage is tantamount to "hate your neighbor."  We are persona non grata, moral undesirables.

We are dealing here with two clashing visions, and only one side has the power: the majority of liberal justices on the Court.  The majority of the Court clearly has no compunction in voiding any legislative or executive effort at buttressing traditional understanding of marriage. 

The five ennobled ones are the only majority that counts.  What the majority in Congress or any State legislature or the people may think is irrelevant, unless such majority sides with the enlightened majority on the Supreme Court, in which case it's all well-and-fine.

The precious five that constitute the majority feel no compunction on overruling a law passed by Congress and signed into law by the President.  Is there any doubt how eagerly it will dispose of a law passed by a State legislature and signed by a measly State governor?

And how naturally shall the majority's view lead to sanctions against the Church?  Or to political groups who seek to advance traditional marriage?  How, for example, can tax exempt status be justified?  How can contributions to such groups be considered tax deductible?  In the view of the five justices that make up the majority, these groups are morally diseased: they advocate, and are indeed built upon, invidious discrimination.

The Catholic Church, basing herself on the natural moral law and reason, insists that giving legal recognition to same-sex unions is against the common good. 

But the majority on the Supreme Court--the five Spartan ephors with not-so-Spartan surnames of Kennedy, Gingsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan--hold exactly the opposite. 

In the words of Justice Scalia, the federal shoe against same-sex "marriage," has dropped. 

One can easily look beyond the "argle bargle" of the majority opinion and see that it is only a matter of time before the "second, state-law shoe" drops.  And it won't stop there.

If DOMA violates the equal protection and due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, it follows invariably that any state law that seeks to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman only violates the equal protection and due process rights of the Fourteenth Amendment.
 
The arguments in Windsor, Scalia observes, are conveniently, even "deliberately," "transposable" to a future challenged to a State law defining marriage as between one man and one woman.  He's already written a draft of a future opinion in his dissent.

After the State laws go, the proponents of same-sex "marriage" will turn their full attention to the Church.  The Church and a few others that align themselves with her will be the only ones insisting that, based upon reason and revelation both, marriage is, and can only be, a life-long commitment between a man and a woman and that any sort of normalization of same-sex unions is a moral, legal, political, and social evil. 

Don't expect much of a hearing: in the eyes of these secular liberal idealogues, the Church has as much moral standing as the Ku Klux Klan.

-----

Andrew M. Greenwell is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas, practicing in Corpus Christi, Texas.  He is married with three children.  He maintains a blog entirely devoted to the natural law called Lex Christianorum.  You can contact Andrew at agreenwell@harris-greenwell.com.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


© 2014 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for April 2014
Ecology and Justice:
That governments may foster the protection of creation and the just distribution of natural resources.
Hope for the Sick: That the Risen Lord may fill with hope the hearts of those who are being tested by pain and sickness.



Comments


More Politics & Policy

IN SCHOOLS, BARS, CHURCHES: Georgia signs into law 'guns everywhere bill' Watch

Image of The new law

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

In schools, in bars and in churches: People in the state of Georgia will be able to carry their guns with them everywhere, after a provision that has been called the "guns everywhere bill" was signed into law by the governor this week. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic ... continue reading


Texas Lt. Gov threatens action if BLM attempts to seize Texas land Watch

Image of Texas Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst has said he will fight the Obama administration if they try to seize Texas land.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Texas Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst has added his name to the list of people disgusted with the Bureau of Land Management's scheme to seize over 90,000 acres of land from Texas without compensation. AUSTIN, TX (Catholic Online) - Texas Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst had some harsh ... continue reading


Congress appalled at Obama administration's 'stunning disregard for law' Watch

Image of

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Appalled by the Obama administration's attempt to "rewrite the Affordable Care Act on a wholesale basis," some members of Congress are calling the White House on the carpet for their "stunning disregard for the law." LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - The ... continue reading


Study finds the American Republic has turned to Oligarchy Watch

Image of The Republic is dead, thanks to money and corruption.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

A new study finds that the Republic is dead and that the United States government has become an oligarchy, even if its preliminary findings stop just short of declaring so. The study reveals that average American citizens have lost their political voice entirely and ... continue reading


Supreme Court rules affirmative action in Michigan's college admissions is unconstitutional Watch

Image of The ruling focused on a voter-passed proposal that banned the use of race in admissions decisions at public universities.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Hailed as a milestone in a decades-long discourse, the Supreme Court has upheld a ban on the use of race in admission decisions at Michigan's public universities. Marked by protests in the streets of Ann Arbor and previous Supreme Court rulings, it was noted ... continue reading


Is affrimative action dead? SCOTUS rules on who can decide the issue Watch

Image of A ruling by the Supreme Court allows states to decide on whether they use a race-conscious policy in admitting students to advanced public education.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

The Supreme Court struck a blow against those seeking to trample on the rights of states, upholding a Michigan voter initiative which banned racial preferences when considering admission into one of the states' public universities, on April 22. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


Exxon Mobil must pay the piper: High court rejects appeal on $105 million verdict Watch

Image of MTBE is an oxygen-containing substance that is added to gasoline to promote more complete combustion and reduce air pollution.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

They were found guilty way back in 2009 and now must pay for their transgressions. The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to overturn a $105 million verdict against Exxon Mobil for contaminating drinking wells in the New York City borough of Queens. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


He just keeps coming and coming! Highest - and longest period of taxation proposed by President Obama Watch

Image of Under Obama's budget proposal, according to the CBO, the budget will never balance.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

President Barack Obama called for what would be the highest level of sustained taxation ever imposed on the American people. According to the analysis published last week by the Congressional Budget Office, the plan was included in the budget proposal Obama ... continue reading


A new Civil War? Lawmakers meet to discuss taking back federal lands for the states Watch

Image of Lawmakers met in Salt Lake City to discuss how the federal government has been using lands in the Western states.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Lawmakers from the Western states gathered in Salt lake City last Friday to discuss what happened on the Bundy ranch in Nevada and to say that it is time for the states, not the federal government, to manage those resources for the good of their people. LOS ANGELES, CA ... continue reading


INCOME TAXES? 'If it reaches a certain point, perhaps you should revolt,' Justice Scalia tells students Watch

Image of Justice Scalia told the students that the justices do not give credence to partisan politics, and that he doesn't care which party controls the White House. He stands by a theory of

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

It came as a most bit of unorthodox advice, from a lawmaker to an audience of impressionable minds. While speaking at the University Of Tennessee College Of Law last week, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was asked by a student about his interpretation of ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Daily Readings

Reading 1, First Peter 5:5-14
5 In the same way, younger people, be subject to the ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 89:2-3, 6-7, 16-17
2 for you have said: love is built to last for ever, ... Read More

Gospel, Mark 16:15-20
15 And he said to them, 'Go out to the whole world; ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for April 25th, 2014 Image

St. Mark
April 25: The second Gospel was written by St. Mark, who, in the New ... Read More

Inform, Inspire & Ignite Logo

Find Catholic Online on Facebook and get updates right in your live feed.

Become a fan of Catholic Online on Facebook


Follow Catholic Online on Twitter and get News and Product updates.

Follow us on Twitter