Supreme Court to tackle affirmative action, gay marriage and voting rights
Court may not even consider whether to hear the gay marriage issue until November
The Supreme Court is gearing up for a new term that will hear a host of highly important cases that will drastically impact American life. Among the cases to be decided will be major rulings about affirmative action, gay marriage and voting rights.
A separate appeal is asking the justices to sustain California's Proposition 8, the amendment to the state constitution that upheld marriage as between one man and one woman and refused to redefine it
Chief Justice John Roberts has joined the court's liberals in sustaining the health care law. The big cases this time around seem likely to have Roberts in his more accustomed role of voting with his fellow conservatives.
A battle over the University of Texas' affirmative action program is the first major case on the court's calendar, with argument scheduled for October 10. Texas uses multiple factors, including community service, work experience, extracurricular activities, awards and race, to help fill the last 20 to 25 percent of the spots in its freshman classes. The court's decision could further limit -- or end the use of racial preferences in college admissions.
This highly contentious matter of gay marriage will be addressed by the court. Several cases seek to guarantee federal benefits for legally married same-sex couples. A provision of the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act deprives same-sex couples of a range of federal benefits available to heterosexual couples.
Some federal courts held that that the provision of the law is unconstitutional. It's a given among most court watchers that the Supreme Court will step up to the plate on the issue.
A separate appeal is asking the justices to sustain California's Proposition 8, the amendment to the state constitution that upheld marriage as between one man and one woman and refuded to alter the definition in the nation's largest state. It must be noted that justices may not even consider whether to hear the gay marriage issue until November.
The future of a cornerstone law of the civil rights movement is also a hot button topic of discussion between the justices.
Congress overwhelmingly approved in 2006, with President George W. Bush's signature, legislation extending for 25 more years a critical piece of the Voting Rights Act. The act requires states and local governments with a history of racial and ethnic discrimination, chiefly the southern states, to get advance approval either from the Justice Department or the federal court in Washington before making any changes that affect elections.
Cases from Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas could prompt the court to deal head on with the issue of advance approval. The South Carolina and Texas cases involve voter identification laws; a similar Indiana law was previously upheld by the court.
Arguments in these issues will not take place until next year.
© 2012, Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
- - -
Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.
Keywords: Supreme Court, gay marriage, civil rights, racial equality
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- The New Golden Calf and the Women of a New Babylon. America and Kardashian - Where's the outrage?
- FBI admits to using drones on U.S. soil. What's next armed drones?
- Supreme Court: No, you can't ask for proof of citizenship for voter registration
- What happens when the Culture of Surveillance meets the Culture of Corruption?
- Obama tells Charlie Rose Americans are uninformed on NSA program. So why doesn't he inform us?
- Bombshell: Low-level NSA agents can wiretap anyone, even the president, sans warrant
- PRISM precursor programs sparked concerns, potential resignations under Bush
- Facebook, Microsoft reveal number of government requests for your info, but no details
- Whistle-blower Snowden says Obama can still save face after PRISM debacle
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?